<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Republic of Canada &#8211; Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flyingsquirrel.ca/index.php/2008/12/07/the-republic-of-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flyingsquirrel.ca/index.php/2008/12/07/the-republic-of-canada/</link>
	<description>Darcy Casselman's weblog.  Like the world needed another one.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John E.</title>
		<link>http://www.flyingsquirrel.ca/index.php/2008/12/07/the-republic-of-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>John E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyingsquirrel.ca/?p=284#comment-298</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Warren, although I agree that better representation by population is a must if we are to improve the current political system in Canada, I don&#039;t see how directly voting for our leader can be any worse. The sad thing is that many Canadians already assume that we directly elect our PM (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081214.wdohcanada1214/BNStory/politics?page=rss&amp;id=RTGAM.20081214.wdohcanada1214). There are many ways we can ameliorate government, and I believe we should look south for inspiration.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warren, although I agree that better representation by population is a must if we are to improve the current political system in Canada, I don&#8217;t see how directly voting for our leader can be any worse. The sad thing is that many Canadians already assume that we directly elect our PM (<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081214.wdohcanada1214/BNStory/politics?page=rss&#038;id=RTGAM.20081214.wdohcanada1214" rel="nofollow">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081214.wdohcanada1214/BNStory/politics?page=rss&#038;id=RTGAM.20081214.wdohcanada1214</a>). There are many ways we can ameliorate government, and I believe we should look south for inspiration.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darcy Casselman</title>
		<link>http://www.flyingsquirrel.ca/index.php/2008/12/07/the-republic-of-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Darcy Casselman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyingsquirrel.ca/?p=284#comment-293</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t &lt;em&gt;personally&lt;/em&gt; want a president.  I certainly don&#039;t want a president with very much power.  What I want is a way to mitigate this destructive tendency Canadians have to fixate on the Prime Minister and nobody else.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The issue&#039;s died down a little, so I&#039;m finding it difficult to rally the righteous indignation necessary for follow-up posts, but I do want to go into the idea further.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t <em>personally</em> want a president.  I certainly don&#8217;t want a president with very much power.  What I want is a way to mitigate this destructive tendency Canadians have to fixate on the Prime Minister and nobody else.</p>

<p>The issue&#8217;s died down a little, so I&#8217;m finding it difficult to rally the righteous indignation necessary for follow-up posts, but I do want to go into the idea further.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tinkerer</title>
		<link>http://www.flyingsquirrel.ca/index.php/2008/12/07/the-republic-of-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>tinkerer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyingsquirrel.ca/?p=284#comment-284</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Huh.  (And I thought American&#039;s had scrambled brains for politics?)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But I really don&#039;t think you want a President.  That would just be a whole &#039;nother problem!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When we Americans vote, yes, we vote for a President (among other things).  But to have ONE PERSON representing 350 MILLION, is really lopsided.  Especially since the President needs only a simple majority of votes cast--heck, he could end up there on only 21.5 percent of the vote, if we had 5 parties almost equally split!  (So ok, we have just two parties that get most of the votes, so it usually works out to about 49-53 percent of the nation&#039;s votes, but a girl can dream of future diversity, right?  heh)  It&#039;s hard enough in the state legislature to get adequate representation for all the residents, and that is on a much smaller scale than the country-wide scene (I speak as a person who lives in a lesser-populated area of my state, and so although our area is very different economically &amp; geographically, we often do not get our needs met because there is more representation for the &lt;em&gt;other&lt;/em&gt; side of the State and so what fits &lt;em&gt;them&lt;/em&gt; usually wins.  &lt;em&gt;sigh&lt;/em&gt;)  And unfortunately, our Presidents have figured out how to wield far more power than they were even intended to have--they are supposed to be just one of many branches all balancing each other (Senate &amp; Congress, who we also vote for).  But, those Presidents, they don&#039;t WANT to be mere figureheads with limited powers, and because it is easier to just point at one person instead of a whole body of them, our citizens seem to have forgotten that is all they really mostly were by design.  And so we let &#039;em get away with their dictatorial behavior, and override the balances.  It gets worse each generation.  Grrr.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nah.  You folks just have the same problem we do--too many are not taking their government seriously for what it is and is MEANT to be, and understanding what their own INDIVIDUAL responsibilities are.  We all need a reality check!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;People in general give me a headache...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh.  (And I thought American&#8217;s had scrambled brains for politics?)</p>

<p>But I really don&#8217;t think you want a President.  That would just be a whole &#8216;nother problem!</p>

<p>When we Americans vote, yes, we vote for a President (among other things).  But to have ONE PERSON representing 350 MILLION, is really lopsided.  Especially since the President needs only a simple majority of votes cast&#8211;heck, he could end up there on only 21.5 percent of the vote, if we had 5 parties almost equally split!  (So ok, we have just two parties that get most of the votes, so it usually works out to about 49-53 percent of the nation&#8217;s votes, but a girl can dream of future diversity, right?  heh)  It&#8217;s hard enough in the state legislature to get adequate representation for all the residents, and that is on a much smaller scale than the country-wide scene (I speak as a person who lives in a lesser-populated area of my state, and so although our area is very different economically &amp; geographically, we often do not get our needs met because there is more representation for the <em>other</em> side of the State and so what fits <em>them</em> usually wins.  <em>sigh</em>)  And unfortunately, our Presidents have figured out how to wield far more power than they were even intended to have&#8211;they are supposed to be just one of many branches all balancing each other (Senate &amp; Congress, who we also vote for).  But, those Presidents, they don&#8217;t WANT to be mere figureheads with limited powers, and because it is easier to just point at one person instead of a whole body of them, our citizens seem to have forgotten that is all they really mostly were by design.  And so we let &#8216;em get away with their dictatorial behavior, and override the balances.  It gets worse each generation.  Grrr.</p>

<p>Nah.  You folks just have the same problem we do&#8211;too many are not taking their government seriously for what it is and is MEANT to be, and understanding what their own INDIVIDUAL responsibilities are.  We all need a reality check!</p>

<p>People in general give me a headache&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.flyingsquirrel.ca/index.php/2008/12/07/the-republic-of-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyingsquirrel.ca/?p=284#comment-283</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If people don&#039;t understand the current system (and they don&#039;t), the answer is not to create a worse system that people will still not understand.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Executive Presidents are arrogant dictators. We already have those under the current system.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What we need are parliaments that accurately reflect the way people voted. Our winner-take-all system means most votes have no effect on the outcome of the election, so election results are always horribly distorted.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Proportional representation is a fundamental attribute of a fair voting system.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If people don&#8217;t understand the current system (and they don&#8217;t), the answer is not to create a worse system that people will still not understand.</p>

<p>Executive Presidents are arrogant dictators. We already have those under the current system.</p>

<p>What we need are parliaments that accurately reflect the way people voted. Our winner-take-all system means most votes have no effect on the outcome of the election, so election results are always horribly distorted.</p>

<p>Proportional representation is a fundamental attribute of a fair voting system.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

